CIT in context: The impact of mental health resource availability and district saturation on call dispositions
Show simple item record
Files in this item
| Title: |
CIT in context: The impact of mental health resource availability and district saturation on call dispositions |
| Author(s): |
Watson, Amy C.; Ottatib, Victor C.; Drainec, Jeff; Morabitod, Melissa
|
| Subject(s): |
crisis intervention teams
mental health
|
| Abstract: |
Abstract
The goals of Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) programs include improving safety during encounters between police and persons with mental illnesses, diverting persons with mental illnesses away from the criminal justice system, and increasing referral and access to mental health services. CIT is a systemic intervention, and as such, its implementation and effectiveness are influenced by existing practices and infrastructures. However, little research has considered the context in which CIT programs are implemented. In this paper, we present research on CIT in four Chicago police districts that vary in terms of two contextual factors hypothesized to influence the impact of CIT training on how calls involving persons with mental illnesses are resolved. Using data from 112 patrol officers in four Chicago police districts, we consider the impact of mental health services availability and CIT saturation (the percentage of district personnel that are CIT certified). Findings indicate that CIT training increased direction to mental health services primarily in districts with greater availability of mental health services. In districts with low service availability, higher CIT saturation increased direction to mental services. The opposite pattern emerged for contact only or informal call resolution. No effects were found for arrest as a call outcome. |
| Issue Date: |
2011-08-05 |
| Publisher: |
Elsevier |
| Citation Info: |
Watson, A. C., Ottati, V. C., Draine, J., & Morabito, M. 2011. CIT in context: The impact of mental health resource availability and district saturation on call dispositions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 34(4): 287–294. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.07.008. |
| Type: |
Article |
| Description: |
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, [Vol 34, Issue 4, August 2011] DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.07.008.
The original publication is available at www.elsevier.com. |
| URI: |
http://hdl.handle.net/10027/8532
|
| ISSN: |
0160-2527 |
| Sponsor: |
Work supported by NIMHR34 MH 081588. |
| Date Available in INDIGO: |
2012-08-17 |
Items in INDIGO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Show simple item record